AI Assisted
Export: PDF & DOCX
Get your custom agreement in minutes
4.8 Rating
Downloaded 3018 times
Get your complete
agreement in minutes

Select a template
Each template already follows legal structure and best practices.

Provide details
The agreement is automatically filled and adapted to your inputs.

Review & download
Check the generated document, make edits if needed, and download a ready-to-use agreement.
Details
Learn more about
Proposed Scheduling Order Template: Deadlines and Trial Terms
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER TEMPLATE FAQ
What is a proposed scheduling order?
A proposed scheduling order is a draft case-management order submitted to the court, usually by the parties, suggesting deadlines and procedures for how the case should move forward. In federal civil practice, the actual scheduling order is governed by Rule 16, and some courts also require the parties to submit a joint proposed schedule after the Rule 26(f) conference.
Why do you need a proposed scheduling order?
You need a proposed scheduling order to organize the case early and clearly state the deadlines the parties are asking the court to adopt. Rule 16 requires the scheduling order to limit the time to join parties, amend pleadings, complete discovery, and file motions, and it may also modify disclosure timing, discovery scope, ESI handling, privilege procedures, and trial-related dates.
When should you use a proposed scheduling order?
Use a proposed scheduling order when the court’s rules, standing order, or judge’s practice requires the parties to submit one, usually after the Rule 26(f) conference. The exact timing varies by court. For example, one federal district requires filing the proposed scheduling order within 14 days after the Rule 26(f) conference, while Rule 26 ties initial disclosures to that conference unless the court sets a different time.
How to write a proposed scheduling order?
Start with the court caption, case number, and the date of the Rule 26(f) conference. Then propose clear deadlines for amendment of pleadings, joinder, initial disclosures if needed, fact discovery, expert disclosures, discovery motions, dispositive motions, pretrial submissions, and trial-related settings. Rule 16 also permits including ESI preservation, privilege-clawback procedures, and pre-motion conference requirements, so those can be added where appropriate.
Can AI Lawyer help if counsel, clients, and court staff all need to review?
AI Lawyer can help by organizing the proposed order into clear sections so each reviewer can find the requested deadlines and case-management terms quickly. It can also add internal reference fields, scheduling notes, and placeholders that make revisions easier to track. A consistent structure helps reduce repeated edits and lowers the chance of missing key details like expert deadlines, discovery cutoff dates, or trial estimates before the proposal is filed.
Similar templates









