Novation Agreement (Free Download + AI Generator)

A novation agreement is a three-party arrangement that replaces one contracting party with another and releases the outgoing party from future obligations. It’s most often used when a business is sold, a contract is moved to an affiliate, or a long-term relationship needs a new “responsible party” without rewriting the entire deal. Unlike a simple assignment, this approach is designed to give everyone certainty about who owes what going forward.

Because contract requirements and interpretations vary by state, the safest approach is to treat this as a controlled transition: confirm consent, define the effective date, state what happens to past breaches, and document any third-party approvals. For a plain-language overview of the concept, see Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute entry on novation.

TL;DR

• Substitutes a new party into an existing deal while keeping most terms intact.
  
  

• Releases the outgoing party from future duties when properly drafted and signed.
  
  

• Reduces disruption in M&A, vendor changes, and long-term projects where continuity matters.
  
  

• Avoids “who is liable now?” disputes by spelling out assumption, release, and transition steps.

You Might Also Like:

• Payment Agreement Template: Installments, Due Dates & Late Fees

• Notice of Commencement (Free Download + AI Generator)

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract and novation rules vary by state and by the terms of the underlying agreement. Consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction for guidance on your specific facts, especially for government contracts or regulated industries.

Who Should Use This Document

This document is useful for businesses and individuals who need to change “who is on the hook” under an existing contract without renegotiating every clause. It’s common in B2B relationships (vendor agreements, SaaS, distribution, construction, leases) and can also apply in B2C contexts (for example, when a service contract is moved to a successor company). It is especially valuable when performance, licensing, or credit risk depends on the identity of the party performing.

It can also be used in real estate and financing contexts, but lenders and landlords often require separate written consent and may impose their own conditions. For government contracting, the process is highly regulated and typically requires a contracting officer’s approval under specific federal rules.

What Is a Novation Agreement?

A novation agreement definition in everyday terms is simple: everyone agrees that a new party steps into the contract, and the departing party is no longer responsible for future performance. It is usually signed by three parties — the remaining original party, the departing party, and the incoming party — so there’s no ambiguity about consent. Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute explains the concept in its entry on novation.

The practical purpose is continuity with clarity. The business terms (pricing, scope, service levels, deliverables) often stay the same, but the “who” changes. That matters when the identity of the performer affects risk, trust, licensing, or credit. Common examples include:

• A buyer acquires a product line and needs existing customer contracts moved to the buyer’s operating entity.
  
  

• A company reorganizes and wants a key vendor contract held by a new subsidiary for operational reasons.
  
  

• A long-term lease or service agreement needs a successor entity because the original party is winding down.

It also helps avoid confusion when parties try to “paper over” a substitution with an assignment alone. Assignment commonly transfers rights (and may involve delegation of duties), but it does not automatically release the original obligor unless the other party clearly agrees — compare Cornell’s explanations of assignment and delegation. If the goal is a true replacement and release, the agreement should say so explicitly and reflect a clear consent and release structure consistent with concepts like release and ongoing contractual relationships (sometimes discussed under privity).

In regulated contexts, the “who” can matter even more. For federal government contracting, for example, a successor-in-interest is typically recognized only through a specific process described in FAR Subpart 42.12, so a private substitution document alone may not be sufficient.

When Do You Need a Novation Agreement?

You typically need this document when the identity of a party must change and the other party will not accept “someone else performing” without explicit written consent. If the contract includes a strict anti-assignment clause, a substitution without consent can trigger breach, termination, or acceleration rights. For a baseline explanation of how assignment differs from a full substitution and release, compare Cornell’s overview of assignment with its definition of novation.

This comes up most often in:

• M&A and asset sales: the buyer wants customer/vendor contracts moved to the buyer’s entity.
  
  

• Corporate restructures: contracts held by an old entity must be moved to a new entity for tax, licensing, or operational reasons.
  
  

• Leases and long-term service arrangements: a landlord or counterparty requires a clear release and a new responsible party.
  
  

• Real estate transactions: in some markets, a “buyer swap” is used so a new buyer replaces the original buyer under a purchase arrangement; this is sometimes discussed as novation real estate in practice, but it still hinges on consent and documentation.

Practical “red flags” that suggest you should not proceed informally: the contract ties performance to a specific license or certification; the counterparty vetted the original party’s financials; the deal includes confidentiality, data access, or regulated services; or the contract requires written consent for any transfer. When these red flags exist, an informal email “ok” can be too weak to prove a full release later. It’s also smart to recognize that “changing who performs” can implicate broader contract enforcement principles — Cornell’s entry on contract is a helpful starting point for how courts generally interpret and enforce agreement terms.

Government contracting is a special case: if a federal award is involved, you typically need a contracting officer-approved novation process rather than just a private agreement. The governing framework and documentation expectations are set out in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 42.12, including detailed requirements and a suggested format in FAR 42.1204.

Related Documents

A substitution document is rarely standalone. In many deals, it works best as part of a controlled transition package so operational teams, finance, and legal all implement the change consistently.

What Should a Novation Agreement Include?

A well-drafted document is not long for the sake of being long — it is precise about substitution, release, and what happens to everything around the contract. The goal is to make the transition enforceable and operationally implementable on day one.

Parties and background. Identify the outgoing party, the continuing party, and the incoming party with exact legal names and addresses, and add short recitals explaining the business reason (sale, reorg, internal transfer). Clear identification reduces “wrong entity” disputes, especially when corporate groups have similarly named affiliates. If authority to sign could be questioned, it helps to tie signature blocks to legal authority concepts like actual authority and apparent authority.

Reference to the underlying contract. Attach or clearly identify the original contract (title, date, amendments) and confirm whether all terms remain in effect except as modified. Anchoring the substitution to the correct version prevents accidental changes caused by referencing an outdated amendment chain. If the underlying deal involves goods, some parties also sanity-check how transfer concepts can apply under UCC § 2-210 (state adoption varies).

Consent of all parties. Make consent explicit: the continuing party agrees to accept the incoming party in place of the outgoing party, and the outgoing party agrees to step out. Explicit consent is what separates a clean substitution from a risky delegation. For conceptual clarity, compare substitution in novation with transferring rights via assignment.

Assumption of obligations. State that the incoming party assumes future duties under the contract as of the effective date, and specify what is included (performance, confidentiality, indemnities, payment, audit/security). A vague assumption clause invites disputes about “which obligations transferred.” If indemnities are part of the deal, align with the general concept of indemnity.

Release and past-claim treatment. Include a clear release for future performance, and be equally clear about past liabilities: are prior breaches preserved, waived, or assumed? The biggest practical fight is often whether the departing party remains liable for earlier issues, so address it directly with language consistent with a release and — if relevant — identify consideration (see consideration).

Effective date and transition mechanics. Define the effective date and operational changes: billing, payment instructions, notice addresses, authorized representatives, and work-in-progress handoff. A defined effective date prevents gaps where nobody is clearly responsible. If you update delivery mechanics, keep them consistent with notice.

Consents, governing law, and signatures. If third-party approvals are required, attach them or make the deal conditional on receipt. Keep governing law consistent unless intentionally changed (see choice of law). Allow counterparts and e-signatures where appropriate; federal support appears in the E-SIGN Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001). Add an order-of-precedence clause to avoid conflicts.

Legal Requirements and Regulatory Context

In most private U.S. transactions, novation is governed by general state contract law principles — offer/acceptance, capacity, legality, and (in many contexts) consideration — plus the specific wording of the underlying contract. As a baseline, Cornell’s Legal Information Institute explains contract, consideration, and the core concept of novation. The key legal risk is proving clear consent and a clear release, because courts often focus on whether the non-transferring party actually agreed to substitute the new party and discharge the old one.

Many disputes arise when parties rely on assignment language instead of an explicit substitution. Even if a contract allows transfer, assignment concepts do not necessarily remove the original obligor unless the other party agrees to release it. For a helpful conceptual contrast, see Cornell’s entries on assignment, delegation, and release. In goods-related agreements, parties sometimes sanity-check how transfer/delegation is treated under commercial law concepts reflected in UCC § 2-210 (noting state adoption and interpretation vary). If the underlying contract contains an anti-assignment or consent requirement, ignoring it can trigger breach remedies — so the agreement should address consents and conditions explicitly.

Government contracting is a special, heavily regulated category. Federal law generally prohibits transferring a federal contract to another party without government recognition, which is why novation is handled through a defined FAR process. The statutory prohibition is reflected in 41 U.S.C. § 6305, and claim-assignment restrictions can also be relevant in certain payment/financing scenarios under 31 U.S.C. § 3727. The FAR provides the framework in FAR Subpart 42.12 and detailed requirements (including a sample format) in FAR 42.1204. For practical drafting alignment, GSA also publishes an official template file in GSA’s Novation Agreement Format (DOCX). In certain DoD contexts, additional requirements can apply (including restructuring-cost language), as reflected in DFARS 242.1204. If a federal contract is involved, treating the substitution as a purely private agreement can fail procedurally even if all companies “agree.”

Common Mistakes When Drafting a Novation Agreement

Treating an assignment as a complete substitution.
Parties sometimes assume that assigning a contract “moves everything,” including liability. If the continuing party has not clearly agreed to a release, the outgoing party may remain responsible even if someone else is performing. Use a three-party signature structure and explicit release language, and sanity-check the difference between substitution and assignment using Cornell’s overviews of assignment and novation.

Failing to define what happens to past breaches and accrued rights.
Many disputes center on whether prior nonperformance, warranty issues, chargebacks, or indemnity claims survive. If you don’t allocate past liability, you create an immediate dispute after signing. Fix this by stating whether claims accrued before the effective date are preserved, waived, or assumed — and by using clear release concepts consistent with Cornell’s explanation of a release.

Missing required third-party consents.
Leases, loans, IP licenses, data-processing agreements, and regulated services often require approval before a party change. Signing the substitution first can trigger a default if consent is a condition. Treat consents as closing conditions or attach them as exhibits; if the contract frames consent as a gating step, it often functions like a condition precedent that must be satisfied before the switch is effective.

Using a vague “assumption” clause that doesn’t map to the underlying contract.
Many contracts have obligations that extend beyond performance (confidentiality, audit rights, security controls, indemnities). If the assumption clause doesn’t clearly include these, the continuing party may argue the incoming party didn’t accept them. Fix this by referencing obligations broadly (“all duties and liabilities”) and calling out sensitive obligations expressly when needed, especially indemnities (see Cornell’s overview of indemnity).

Ignoring special rules for government contracts.
A private substitution document does not automatically transfer federal contracts. If federal awards are involved, you usually need a FAR-compliant process and contracting officer execution. Use the FAR resources in FAR Subpart 42.12 and FAR 42.1204 as your roadmap, and be aware of the federal anti-assignment statute at 41 U.S.C. § 6305. For formatting expectations, it also helps to compare your document to the government’s model language, such as GSA’s Novation Agreement Format (DOCX).

How the AILawyer.pro Novation Agreement Template Helps

A good novation agreement template should force the critical decisions upfront: who is being replaced, what the effective date is, what happens to past liabilities, and whether third-party approvals are required. The AI Lawyer template is built around that structure, using guided prompts to capture party identities, the underlying contract reference, assumption language, release scope, and notice updates. That structure helps prevent “silent omissions” — the missing release sentence, the missing consent condition, or the unclear effective date.

It also supports common real-world variations: internal affiliate transfers, M&A-driven contract moves, and situations where the continuing party wants added assurances (like updated insurance certificates or a limited guarantee). The result is a cleaner transition packet that business teams can actually implement — billing updates, contact updates, and contract administration changes are addressed, not left to guesswork.

Practical Tips for Completing Your Novation Agreement

1. Start with the underlying contract and its transfer language. Pull the exact clause on assignment/consent, note any notice addresses, and confirm whether delegation is allowed. For quick concept checks, compare Cornell’s explanations of assignment, delegation, and novation. If consent is required before the switch is effective, treat it like a gating step similar to a condition precedent.
   
   

2. Confirm the business “why,” then map it to documents. Asset sale, merger, internal reorg, or buyer swap each changes how you handle liabilities and approvals. Make sure your deal documents (asset purchase agreement, closing checklist, transition plan) match the novation effective date and handoff mechanics. Misaligned closing documents are a common source of post-closing confusion.
   
   

3. Decide how you will handle past liabilities — then say it plainly. Identify whether accrued claims stay with the departing party, shift to the incoming party, or are waived. Use clear drafting tied to the concepts of release, consideration, and (if relevant) indemnity. If you’re changing who pays invoices or receives refunds, include a short schedule or exhibit to prevent accounting disputes.
   
   

4. Make transition steps operational, not just legal. Update billing contacts, payment instructions, notice addresses, and authorized representatives as of a defined effective date. If the underlying contract has strict notice mechanics, keep your updates consistent with general notice principles so communications don’t get lost in transition.
   
   

5. Collect third-party approvals early. Landlords, lenders, licensors, and key customers often require written consent, sometimes with their own forms. Build consent collection into your closing checklist and consider making the novation conditional until all consents are received.
   
   

6. Escalate quickly when government contracts are involved. Federal contracts usually require a contracting officer-approved novation process, not just a private agreement. Use FAR Subpart 42.12 and the detailed requirements in FAR 42.1204 as your roadmap, and be mindful of the federal anti-assignment statute at 41 U.S.C. § 6305. For drafting alignment, compare your structure to GSA’s Novation Agreement Format (DOCX).

Checklist Before You Sign or Use the Novation Agreement

• All three parties are correctly named and authorized (entity names, signers, titles); if authority could be questioned, sanity-check signature authority concepts like actual authority.
  
  

• The correct underlying contract version is referenced (including amendments and exhibits); if you’re pulling a chain of amendments, confirm you’re pointing to the operative agreement consistent with general contract principles.
  
  

• The effective date is clear and operationally workable (billing, notices, performance handoff); make sure notice addresses and delivery rules align with the contract’s notice requirements.
  
  

• Assumption and release language is explicit and addresses both future duties and past claims; the release should be drafted to match the legal concept of a release.
  
  

• Required third-party consents are obtained or made conditions (lender/landlord/customer/licensor); if consent is required before effectiveness, treat it like a condition precedent.
  
  

• All related documents are aligned (amendments, guarantees, insurance certificates, transition plan); where federal contracts are involved, cross-check the required novation package under FAR 42.1204.

FAQ: Common Questions About the Novation Agreement

Is this document always required to change who performs a contract?
Not always. Some contracts allow assignment/delegation with consent or permit internal transfers. But if you need the outgoing party fully released, a formal three-party substitution is often the cleanest path.

How is this different from assignment?
Assignment typically transfers rights (and may delegate duties), but it does not automatically release the original party unless the other side clearly agrees. Cornell’s assignment resource is a good baseline for the concept.

Can we do this with only two signatures?
Sometimes parties try, but the safest evidence of full consent and release is a document signed by all involved parties. If a two-party approach is used, it must still clearly show the continuing party’s agreement to accept the new performer and release the outgoing party.

Do we need “new consideration”?
Often the mutual promises (assumption and release) are treated as sufficient, but rules vary by state and context. When in doubt, document the exchange of promises clearly and keep the agreement internally consistent.

What about government contracts?
Federal contracts often require a FAR process and contracting officer execution. Start with FAR Subpart 42.12 and the detailed requirements in FAR 42.1204.

Do we have to update notice addresses and billing instructions?
Yes. Most post-signature confusion comes from operational gaps, not legal theory — customers keep paying the old entity, notices go to the wrong address, and performance responsibilities are unclear.

Get Started Today

A well-structured novation agreement can prevent misunderstandings, reduce transition risk, and clarify who is responsible for performance after a deal closes. Use the AILawyer.pro template to organize the key elements — consent, assumption, release scope, effective date, and notice updates — so the substitution is clear to both legal and operational teams. After you generate a draft, align it with the underlying contract’s transfer clause and collect any required third-party consents before signing. For high-value or regulated transactions, have a local attorney review the final version to confirm state-specific enforceability.

Sources and References

41 U.S.C. § 6305

Actual authority

E-SIGN Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001)

GSA’s Novation Agreement Format (DOCX)

Condition precedent

FAR 42.1204

FAR Subpart 42.12

You Might Also Like:

• Payment Agreement Template: Installments, Due Dates & Late Fees

• Notice of Commencement (Free Download + AI Generator)